Two losses later, including a 23-point loss at Nebraska, it all but looks to be confirmed. Notes: In last Friday’s post, I said the Illini were an NIT team. Remaining Games: Iowa, Michigan, Wisconsin. Relevant Tiebreakers-Disadvantage: Indiana (February 9th) Minnesota (won-December 27th lost-January 28th, by 0-1 record against Indiana) Penn State (January 19th) Purdue (December 31st and February 15th) Wisconsin (January 22nd). Relevant Tiebreakers-Advantage: Nebraska (won-January 7th lost-February 18th, by 1-0 record against Michigan State) Northwestern (won-January 4th lost-February 5th, by 1-0 record against Ohio State). Records listed are conference records, only. Assuming there are still tied teams, the Big Ten directs procedures 2 through 4 from the Two Team tiebreakers are used.Īctual scenarios are after the jump. To sort out the remaining teams, the Big Ten directs that the next team is seeded according to the winning percentage against all tied teams, not just the remaining ones. Team with the highest winning percentage against the other tied teams prevails. Coin toss directed by the Commissioner’s office.ġ. Where teams are still tied, the final tiebreaker is used.Ĥ. The team with the higher percentage will be the better seed. Simply put, add up the wins and losses of the opponents of the tied teams (provided they are Division I teams). Win-loss percentage of all Division I opponents. Assuming the teams are still tied, move onto the third tiebreaker.ģ. With an added twist, the Big Ten directs where the comparison is done among another set of teams with tied records, the two teams are to be compared based on the collective record of that group of tied teams, rather than individual teams. The highest winning percentage prevails here, so 1-0 is better than 1-1, but 2-0 and 1-0 are treated the same. Each team’s record against the team who finishes the highest in the final regular season standings. Where there are two meetings and the meetings result in different winners, the Big Ten directs the next tiebreaker be used.Ģ. Pretty easy where there is one meeting between the two teams or where there are the two meetings and the same team wins both. The Big Ten breaks down the tiebreakers by two team ties versus multiple team ties.ġ. To see a composite view of how each team has performed in the Big Ten against the others, click here. Before we get into that, let’s review the Big Ten’s Tiebreaking Procedures.
0 kommentar(er)
